inCrysis - Crysis Forums

I think it will have about the sane system requirements as Bioshock. Here is a site that checks if your computer is able to drive the game. Just go to "www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest" and chose bioshock from the list.

I'm perfectly happy and quite content at 30fps.  You really don't notice "much" difference at frame rates above 30, hence the reason NTSC standardized 29.97fps as the standard for broadcast medium.  60fps is a waste to me.  I'd rather have that extra 30fps converted into lusher, more detailed worlds and graphics.  And "motion blur" is NOT what makes a film appear smooth.  Even the 23.967fps looks great in the theatre. When examining a single frame, each is crisp and clear.  The exception of course is as with what econundrum was saying. Only high motion objects or camera movement cause blur.  No post production is done to create motion blur for a smooth effect.  Some forms of reverse telecine create the illusion of motion blur then de-interlacing into a NTSC broadcast standard, but other than that, the only motion blur is that percieved by the eye.

Last edited by emike09 (13-09-2007 19:55:45)

Lompocus wrote:

about 90% of all videos have been on DX9. The game probably brings 8800s to their knees on high end DX10 settings.

How do i know this? Look at particle effects in the videos, if you see some sort of tearing between the particle's sprite showing through a wall, it's DX9.

Let's say you blow something up in a house in DX9. The explosion will break past the house.

In DX10, the fire and smoke will filter out through the windows. Just look at the Lost Planet DX 10 demo, turn on particle effects to highest, and throw a grenade in a house.

True, but the power of the newer card overthrow older cards tenfold. When they said "8 times the power", they almost lived up to that. 128 to 320 stream processors, entirely new architecture. I know you're just making a judgment, but you seem to underestimate the new generation card's performance. But like I said, just a judgment. You could be right or wrong.

Also, the game is to scale back to FarCry's era. Don't feel so inclined to spend hundreds on upgrades, unless you really really want to play on ultra high.

Last edited by SirKillsAlot (13-09-2007 21:19:36)

Nile505 wrote:

There's no way you can say that it's going to get the same requirements as bioshock. Crysis is going to have cpu requirements and i bet graphically its going to be bumped. You already know bioshock looks sick, bit crysis is looking way better.

I meant almost the same system requirements, but higher. But the requirements test-site works anyway; if you cant drive bioshock on minimum, then you certainly cannot drive Crysis on minimum.

Last edited by Galain (14-09-2007 11:28:15)

Osoka wrote:

triple_A wrote:

1-20fps = unplayable
20-30fps = playable but not easy on the eyes
30-40fps = playable & looking smooth
40->fps = perfect

i agree 100%  i am completely happy with 45 fps....i cant tell a difference between that and any higher....at 30 fps i can definetly tell

Exactly!! Its funny how all these people expect soo much... Are they forgetting that there are billions of resistors etc on Cards these days, and tbh the amount of information being loaded is WAY to much to even think about, it probably covers the earth on paper y aknow, the amount of info is crazy....

But no, When there HDR, Smoke, High Reso's, Motion Blur, AA, Anistrophic Filtering etc, all this shit goin on, including explosions, ai, models, maps, paths, coding, scripts, etc, people complain if they get 1 little section of lag for it to catch up, jesus christ, thats what I think!!!

Yeah, but thats to be expected

I reeeaaaaaallllyyyy hope my 8800GTS runs it well..

Jormis wrote:

I reeeaaaaaallllyyyy hope my 8800GTS runs it well..

You sure did contribute with much ,You know it will run it well , just that the graphical settings might not be ultra high omg pwnzor

jihadmaster wrote:

i have a AMD antolon 64 3500, a ati x600 and 1 gb of ram.
if this game can run smoothly on my pc (30 minimum 40/50 maximum) and still look like far cry on reasonabily high settings on 800x600 res i would be more than happy.
what are my chances?

I had a Nvidia 7900GS-card, 1gb ram and 2ghz intel duo processor , and I drove Farcry on max quality, exept screen-resulotion and AA. Crytek has annonced that if you managed to play Farcry on ultra-high(or something like that ), then you could drive Crysis on low, almost medium(depends of how well you drove Farcry)

It's been reported that the 8800 GTS will run it maxed on 1280x960 res, no?